Skip to main content

Market Daily

Private Capital at 12 Percent Isn’t Expensive. Misunderstanding It Is.

By: KeyCrew Media

Private lending gets a bad reputation, and much of it comes down to the rate. When a borrower hears 12 percent and has a bank quote sitting at six, the math feels obvious. It isn’t.

The real cost of capital isn’t just the interest rate on the page, and according to Gelt Financial, a national private lender with nearly four decades in the market, most borrowers who walk away from private capital because of the rate end up paying more in ways they didn’t account for.

H. Jack Miller, who founded Gelt in 1989 and has been underwriting real estate deals ever since, has spent years making this case. The number that looks expensive is often the number that makes the deal possible at all.

The Tony Soprano Problem

Miller calls it the “Tony Soprano perception.” Private capital sounds like it belongs in a back-room deal, loan sharking, something reserved for people with no other options.

The reality, he says, is the opposite. Gelt regularly closes deals in four to five days after banks have said no or asked borrowers to wait two months. Borrowers who leave reviews aren’t complaining about the rate. They’re focused on the speed of execution and the experience of working with a lender that follows through.

Miller points to Elon Musk as a counterexample. The wealthiest person in the world does not borrow at six percent all of the time. He raises capital through private equity and venture funding. When you factor in the equity stake surrendered, that capital costs more than 12 percent. It just doesn’t look like a loan.

The Real Alternative Is Usually More Expensive

The more common comparison isn’t Musk, but a local investor who brings in a family member or business partner rather than borrow from a private lender. The partner puts up the money in exchange for half the profit, an arrangement that feels more palatable than a 12 percent rate but is often far more costly when the numbers are run.

“When you do the economics, giving up 50 percent of your profits is far more expensive than borrowing the money at 12 percent,” Miller says. “And you have to deal with that person at every dinner table for the rest of your life.”

The mistake, he argues, is treating the interest rate as the total cost of capital without accounting for what the deal actually returns, or what’s surrendered to access money at a lower nominal rate.

What 37 Years of Underwriting Teaches About Discipline

Gelt went through the 2008 financial crisis like every other lender. They had hundreds of defaults. Miller describes the period that followed as clarifying.

After reviewing every deal that went bad, a pattern emerged: every loss came from exceptions, cases where underwriting discipline slipped in favor of getting a deal done. “100 percent of losses came from those exceptions,” Miller says. “When we stayed disciplined, we didn’t lose a penny.”

He draws a clear distinction between Gelt and newer entrants in the private lending market, most of which launched in the last decade and have never operated through a significant economic downturn. Surviving the Great Recession produced a level of discipline that a strong run of deals in a favorable market cannot replicate.

The Structural Shift in How Real Estate Gets Financed

Banks have grown more restrictive over the past several years. Regulatory requirements are stricter, approval timelines have stretched, and more borrowers, particularly those pursuing time-sensitive or value-add deals, are finding that the bank template no longer fits their situation.

Private capital has expanded to fill that gap, becoming more sophisticated, more structured, and more accessible than it was a decade ago. Miller believes the shift is permanent. Private capital used to be the option borrowers turned to when everything else had failed. For bridge transactions, fast closings, and profiles that don’t fit conventional underwriting, it is increasingly the first call.

“Some people still say, ‘Oh my god, 12 percent,’” Miller says. “But sophisticated operators understand that if the deal works at the cost of capital, the cost of capital is not the problem.”

Gelt’s track record across hundreds of closed deals reflects that logic in practice: fast, flexible financing for borrowers who need to move and deals that make sense on the numbers.

About Gelt Financial: Gelt Financial LLC is a national private lender and distressed debt buyer operating across 37 states. Founded in 1989, the company specializes in commercial bridge loans, foreclosure bailouts, and non-performing loan acquisitions for real estate investors and operators.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice. The views and opinions expressed herein reflect those of the individuals quoted and do not represent an endorsement of any company, product, or service mentioned. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult qualified professionals before making any investment decisions.

S&P 500 and Nasdaq Hit Record Highs as AI Earnings and Falling Oil Lift Markets

U.S. equities closed at fresh record highs on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, as a combination of strong corporate earnings, easing energy prices, and renewed enthusiasm for artificial intelligence-related stocks pushed major benchmarks to all-time peaks. The rally reflected investor confidence in the underlying strength of the U.S. economy, even as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continued to color the broader market backdrop.

Major Indices Reach New Peaks

The S&P 500 climbed 0.81% to close at a record 7,259.22, gaining 58.47 points on the day. The Nasdaq Composite rose 1.03% to finish at an all-time high of 25,326.13, lifted by gains across the technology sector. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 356.35 points, or 0.73%, ending the session at 49,298.25 and reclaiming the 49,000 level.

All 11 GICS sectors ended the session higher, marking a broad-based rally that extended well beyond the AI-driven names that have led much of the year’s gains. Technology was the strongest performer in the S&P 500, adding more than 2%, while a rebounding materials sector also gained roughly 2% after a sharp pullback earlier in the week.

The PHLX semiconductor index jumped 4.2% to a record high of its own, reflecting renewed momentum in chip-related equities. The index is now up roughly 55% in 2026, underscoring the central role that AI infrastructure spending continues to play in U.S. equity performance.

Intel Surges on Apple Manufacturing Talks

Among individual stocks, Intel was one of the day’s largest movers, surging roughly 13% after Bloomberg reported that Apple has held early-stage discussions with the chipmaker and Samsung about manufacturing the main processors for its devices. While neither Apple nor Intel confirmed the talks, the report fueled speculation that Intel’s foundry business could secure a high-profile customer at a critical moment in its turnaround strategy.

The semiconductor rally extended to other names. Micron Technology surpassed a $700 billion market capitalization during the session, capping a remarkable run that has seen the stock rally nearly 700% over the past year. The gains came amid broader strength in computer hardware stocks, including memory producers and storage providers, as analysts continue to flag tight supply conditions for high-bandwidth memory used in AI applications.

Advanced Micro Devices also rose ahead of its quarterly earnings report, scheduled for release after the closing bell. The chip designer ultimately delivered first-quarter results that beat Wall Street expectations and raised second-quarter guidance, reinforcing the broader AI-driven earnings narrative.

Oil Prices Retreat as Ceasefire Holds

A roughly 4% decline in oil prices provided additional support for equities, easing concerns that elevated energy costs could accelerate inflation and complicate the Federal Reserve’s policy path. West Texas Intermediate crude futures dipped 3.9% to settle at $102.27 per barrel, while Brent crude futures fell 3.99% to close at $109.87.

The pullback in oil came as Washington signaled that its fragile ceasefire with Iran was holding, despite recent attacks in the Strait of Hormuz that had raised fresh concerns about energy supply disruptions. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the ceasefire “certainly holds,” remarks that helped calm investor anxiety about a wider escalation that could threaten global energy infrastructure.

For corporate decision-makers, the energy retreat carries significant implications. Lower oil prices ease input cost pressures across industries ranging from transportation and logistics to manufacturing and consumer goods, while also reducing the risk of a renewed inflation spike that could force the Federal Reserve to keep rates higher for longer.

Strong Corporate Earnings Underpin the Rally

The records set on Tuesday were not driven by sentiment alone. According to data from LSEG, S&P 500 companies are tracking toward aggregate earnings growth of 28% year-over-year for the first quarter of 2026 — the strongest quarterly profit growth since 2021.

Tom Hainlin, an investment strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis, told reporters that “markets are following fundamentals,” noting that earnings are coming in strong and that business spending — particularly on AI and other productivity tools — remains robust. He added that consumer spending also continues to support the broader economic outlook.

The earnings season has been particularly favorable for AI-related companies. Pfizer beat first-quarter expectations and reaffirmed its full-year guidance, while Pinterest popped 15% on stronger-than-expected revenue guidance. The breadth of positive results across sectors has helped sustain the rally beyond the megacap technology names that dominated 2025.

The combination of record-high indices, easing energy prices, and accelerating earnings growth has created an unusually supportive environment for U.S. equities heading into the summer. However, market participants remain attentive to several risk factors, including the durability of the U.S.-Iran ceasefire, the Federal Reserve’s policy stance amid persistent inflation, and the upcoming transition in Fed leadership as Jerome Powell’s term ends on May 15, 2026.

For now, the message from Tuesday’s session is clear: corporate fundamentals, AI-driven capital spending, and falling input costs are working in concert to push U.S. markets to new highs.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Stock prices, index levels, commodity prices, and company-related data referenced are accurate as of the publication date and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.